WHY THE WORLD IS RUN BY EFFING NUTTERS

Nations and prominent organisations on this planet are very obviously led by psychopathic personalities, particularly in Western Europe, the United States, and Israel.

We routinely discuss the possible outcomes of this perilous situation and we focus on the rational aspects as these reflect history, but we never articulate the madness of individuals, or what we should do about them.

Worse, we never acknowledge that their insanity is incurable, or that this is a mad dog situation. This aversion seems to be generational. My ancient peers understood this well and they acknowledged unpleasant realities with wry humour: “The only cure for a mad dog is to cut off its tail… right behind the ears”. Problem solved.

I especially have in mind people like Netanyahu, Trump, Gates, Fauci, Harari, Schwarb, Zelensky, Starmer, Jobs, Zuckerberg, Macron… probably a hundred or so, truth be told, who are stark raving bonkers yet seem able to destroy humanity and the planet with impunity.

The most recent crisis seems to have been Trump and Netanyahu’s targeting of entirely inoffensive Iran, applying forty year identical and episodic repeat accusations of threatening the world with a nuclear bomb. We have not one, but two Emperors With No Clothes here and everybody is pretending they exhibit sartorial elegance.

Disregarding the acknowledged validity of observations contributed by the wide range of excellent geopolitical analysts at our disposal… Ritter, Sleboda, Escobar, McGregor, Wilkerson, McGovern, Martyanov, Sachs, Davis, Johnston, Marandi, Blumenthal, Norton, Berletic, and Crooke… every one of them masters in their respective fields, and I heard them all; yet I consider that we are looking in entirely the wrong direction for solutions.

We need to go back to basics:

Normal human beings possess a mental anchor which they drop in their current bed of perceived reality, and this is routinely reset as they progress on the often-tempestuous journey through the sea of life. Highly adaptable people re-anchor frequently, an attribute alternatively defined as manifest intelligence.

Other people fear to reset their anchor, fearing they will be cast adrift. When their environment changes rapidly, those unable to re-anchor become increasingly fearful and apprehend danger in every direction, and they view those who do adjust as guilty of societal destabilisation: threats to security, violators of the natural order, purveyors of heresy, and so on. The more extreme of these consider that only the death of guilty parties will restore order.

We may well wonder, what factors spawn the personality difference?

In the normal course of events, children gain strength from parental love and, presuming they have access to nutrition, knowledge, and constructive life experiences, they routinely mature into highly adaptive adults. However, in some environments, and even within entire cultures (ie hunter-gatherers and theocracies), not only is anchor re-setting discouraged, it is condemned as a basic values-violation and this condemnation is intensified with the imposition of counter-beliefs that are in diametric conflict with otherwise clearly visible evidence and logic.

Such developmental repression, when it is imposed on children, especially where the prime cultural driver is fundamentalist religion, is sometimes accompanied by withdrawal of love and replaced with emotional detachment. This produces people who we would describe as psychopaths and/or narcissists; the latter said to be triggered by severe emotional trauma.

This explains how entire cultures, and we are referring here to Zionism/Israelis, become psychopathic. There is no cure.

Likewise, the people we describe as Neocons, ideological extremists, and individuals such as Donald Trump and Netanyahu, are in this category.

Humanity has failed to recognise this dangerous outcome of mal-development because the field of American psychiatry was an offset of the also-psychotic Eugenics Society, a Zionist entity, which hijacked psychology and IQ testing, much to the chagrin of its inventor, Alfred Binet (see previous articles on IQ).

Thus, the western world is locked into acceptance of dangerous psychopaths and narcissists as local, national, and geopolitical leaders. We view them as dangerous yet are unable to excise them from what have become accepted and normative hierarchies.

Moreover, since the 1880s, there has been no serious questioning of the legitimacy of hierarchies. This episode of American history was the post-Lincoln assassination movement known as Populism, a diminutive of Abraham’s lyrical definition of democracy: “Government of the people, by the people and for the people”; at a time when Thomas Paine’s “The people are the source of all authority” still had popular currency.

Unsurprisingly, the Zionists defeated the Populists and have since obscured their movement title and then re-defined Democracy as elected dictatorship.

If we are to prevent human extinction, an event easily enabled with a psychopathic finger on a red button, we need to recognise this globally and ban such profiles from socially prominent roles. Like the mad dog analogy, we need to remove the lunatics from circulation or, better still, kill them all. What is problematic is that it would take dictatorial control to install such a radical solution. This could be considered a perilous way to introduce genuine democracy to the world.

There is a way.